UP FRONT BAIL OUTS

The authority for a city in Indiana to act as a governmental entity comes from the Indiana Code which the Indiana Legislature passed into law. One group of elected decision makers working for the city and for voting taxpayers is council members. Council members each individually make decisions like every other human being using their own preferences. Two examples are: i) council members who appropriate a half million dollars for the city to purchase buildings prefer to spend taxpayers’ money and lose tax revenue from private ownership of the real estate; and ii) council members who vote to loan taxpayers’ money as wholly forgivable prefer to forego the city making a profit (interest). Is the thinking behind these two preferences productive for the taxpayers?

Private decision makers who prefer making profit must think critically before venturing into a new, productive opportunity. Private decision makers (private venturers) are motivated to do so, compared to politicians, because private decision makers have their own “skin in the game.” Private decision makers must think through income and expenses. If income is not greater than expenses, private decision makers would not move forward with the possible new venture because there is too much risk.

Politicians who prefer to influence private venturers’ profit decisions with selling buildings under cost, providing money with forgivable loans, and incurring construction costs for private venturers’ developments while spending taxpayers’ money, directly cause private venturers to lose clarity. Private venturers allow the expenses they do not have to pay for because the city is paying with taxpayers’ money, to trump the risk and reward analysis. Such private venturers do not figure out how to manage the real risk in order to move forward since they are getting “bailed out” up front. Up front bail outs lead to hurt feelings, sour relationships, poor decisions, and lost jobs.